Example 1: Success
The Nagasaki Chair
I would view this design as a success. This is a new made design by Mathieu Mategot. This chair carries many qualities found within the syntactical guidelines. The chair is visually balanced; cut it vertically and it will be the same. The viewer can see that the design carries simple and structural qualities. I would say that this chair has more leveling qualities than sharpening; the struts, the frame, the shape and form of the chair, all are balanced and equal. I think that the form and color of the chair represent an attracting quality as well; the design has fluidity.
Example 2: Not Successful (not as successful)
Mobilis Lounge Chair
I would say that this design is not as successful. The chair was designed by Marcel Wanders. It has less qualities of the syntactical guidelines than the other example, the Nagasaki Chair. This chair is not balanced, and it is actually less balanced depending on the user. This chair has a swinging seat that can be used by flip the chair over its base, so there are two functions; upright seating and lounge seating. I would say that this chair also has more stressful qualities to it, that create a more chaotic perception of this chair. I think that because there is no balance to the chair, a sense of dynamic stress is created by the form of the chair. While it is still a chair, I think that compared to the qualities of the Nagasaki chair, this design is not as successful. Not to mention that it is impractical, expensive, and ugly, through my eyes.
No comments:
Post a Comment